Thomas Friedman: Use Gas Tax to Move the U.S. Toward Energy Independence

My fourteen day free trial of Times Select uncovered Thomas Friedman of the NY Times beating the drum, as he has in the past, for the administration to do more to move the U.S. toward energy independence.  I agree with his conclusion - don't get your hopes up:

Bush's Waterlogged Halo, by Thomas Friedman, NY Times: Following President Bush's speech in New Orleans, many U.S. papers carried the same basic headline: "Bush Rules Out Raising Taxes for Gulf Relief." The president is planning to rely on "spending cuts" instead to pay for rebuilding New Orleans. Yeah, right - and if you believe that, I have some beachfront property in Biloxi I'd like to sell you. The underlying message of all these stories is that the Bush team sees no reason to change course in response to Katrina.

I beg to differ. Katrina deprived the Bush team of the energy source that propelled it forward for the last four years: 9/11 and the halo over the presidency that came with it. The events of 9/11 created a deference … That deference is over. If Mr. Bush wants to make anything of his second term, he'll have to do his own Nixon-to-China turnaround, reframe the debate and recast the priorities of his presidency. He seems to think that by offering to spend billions of dollars to rebuild one city, New Orleans, he'll get his leadership halo back. Wrong. Just throwing more borrowed money at New Orleans is not leadership. Mr. Bush needs to frame a new agenda ... And what should be the centerpiece of a policy of American renewal is blindingly obvious: making a quest for energy independence the moon shot of our generation. The president should have done that on the morning of Sept. 12, 2001. The country was ready. But the president whiffed. Katrina - nature's 9/11 - has given him a rare do-over. Imagine - I know it is a stretch - that the president announced tomorrow that he wanted an immediate 50-cents-a-gallon gasoline tax - the "American Renewal Tax," to be used to rebuild New Orleans, pay down the deficit, fund tax breaks for Americans to convert their cars to hybrid technology or biofuels, fund a Manhattan Project to develop alternatives for energy independence, and subsidize mass transit systems for our major cities. And imagine if he tied this to an appeal to young people to go into science, math and engineering for the great national purpose of making us the greenest nation on the planet, to help liberate us from dependence on the worst regimes in the world for our oil …

Americans will change their long-term energy habits, and companies will develop green products, only if they are certain the price of gasoline will not go back down. A gasoline tax … and stronger regulation would force U.S. companies to innovate in what is going to be one of the most important global industries in the 21st century: green technologies. By coddling our auto and industrial companies when it comes to mileage standards and the environment, all the Bush team is doing is ensuring that they will be dinosaurs and that Chinese, Japanese and Indian companies will take the lead in green technologies … Look what Jeff Immelt, the C.E.O. of G.E., said: "America should strive to make energy and environmental practices a national core competency and by doing so, create exports in jobs. ..." Setting the goal of energy independence, along with a gasoline tax, could help to solve so many of our problems today - from the deficit to climate change and national security. And Americans would pay it if they thought the extra money was going to renew America, not Iran, and not just New Orleans. And if the Texas-oilman president became the energy-independence president - now, that would snap heads and make this a truly relevant presidency. No way, you say. Probably right. But either Mr. Bush does a Nixon-to-China or his next three years are going to be a Bush-to-Nowhere.

Comments

[CalculatedRisk]

Too funny. The odds of Bush taking that approach are zero - one of the few certainties in life! Yes, America leading the drive towards oil independence (not just energy independence) would rescue Bush's 2nd term.

"America should strive to make energy and environmental practices a national core competency and by doing so, create exports in jobs. ..." Jeff Immelt. Exactly. This addresses energy issues, the trade deficit, global warming and gives America a vision of leadership.

In other words, it will never happen under Bush.

says...

INTERVIEW-High oil prices chance to boost efficiency-Brinkhorst

THE HAGUE, Sept 20 (Reuters) - Developed economies should see high energy prices as a chance to increase resource efficiency and separate economic growth from its impact on the environment, Dutch Economy Minister Laurens Jan Brinkhorst said.

"We now have a historic opportunity to bring the Dutch economy on to a higher level, a more knowledge-intensive level, a level that is less dependent on energy intensity," Brinkhorst told Reuters in an interview on Monday, but embargoed for release until after Tuesday's budget presentation.

"When we look at 1975-1985, roughly speaking the economy grew by 25 percent and we had a stable energy use. We had historically high energy prices, there was more investment in alternative energies and there was pressure for energy efficiency," Brinkhorst said.

"Between 1985 and the end of the 90s the economy also grew by 25 to 30 percent, but with a parallel development of energy use. That shows that when you have low energy prices, there's a disincentive."

The Dutch government has earmarked a total of 1 billion euros ($1.2 billion) for spending on offshore wind energy in the years 2006 to 2013 and will spend 250 million euros over several years on projects to conserve energy, reduce carbon dioxide emissions and renewable energy sources including bio fuels.

By 2010, some 9 percent of electricity is expected to come from renewable sources.

Nuclear energy is back in vogue as Europe struggles to meet targets to cut emissions of greenhouses gases and reduce dependency on imported crude oil.

The Netherlands' sole nuclear power plant at Borssele will remain open for 20 years beyond its scheduled closure date of 2013.

The government also plans to lower the car and motorcycle tax for relatively fuel-efficient cars by up to 1,000 euros and raise it by as much as 540 euros for less fuel-efficient cars.

[motorcycle oil]

A few years ago, it was difficult to find synthetic motor oils, and equally difficult to find someone who admitted

to using them. Nowadays, however, you can find synthetic motor oils on the shelves of Wal-Mart, and other retailers,

and the number of people turning to synthetic motor oils, particularly in light of the recent events affecting fuel

prices, has risen greatly.

So why do people use synthetic motor oils rather than sticking with the old petroleum based stand-bys which are

admittedly cheaper?

1. Let's start with the cost per quart issue. Synthetic motor oils ARE more expensive at purchase. However, these

oils last longer, requiring fewer oil changes. As a synthetic motor oil outlasts several changes of petroleum based

lubricants, the ultimate out-of-pocket cost of the lubricant is less. This cost savings becomes even greater if you

have someone else change your oil for you rather than doing it yourself!