More Questions about FEMA and Homeland Security
Richard Carson raises a good point in his debate over the role of government in fighting wildfires:
Where was the Forest Service?, by Richard Carson, Commentary, LA Times: ...I could not agree with you more that (a) the federal response was disastrously slow, and that (b) the state and local government bears substantial responsibility for this slow response. We are also in agreement that FEMA was practically useless in the early days of the fire, and that the military was anxious to help out and should have been allowed to do so. You are, however, much too quick to let FEMA and the military off the hook, and you left out the U.S. Forest Service altogether. ...
Setting wildfires in the West has long been seen as one of the major things terrorists could do with minimal resources. FEMA's failure to have a plan for mobilizing the federal firefighting assets of the U.S. Forest Service and the military in a timely manner leads one to ask if FEMA's only real function is, as you say, to "give away money after the fires." ...
Posted by Mark Thoma on Friday, November 2, 2007 at 01:26 AM in Economics, Terrorism |
Permalink
TrackBack (0)
Comments (17)
Recent Posts
New Comments
Follow on Twitter
Friend on Facebook
Blog Feed on Tumblr
Email, Web Pages
New Links