« "Leaving Economics to the Economists, Not the Politicians" | Main | links for 2009-02-26 »

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Employee Free Choice Act

This ad appeared in the Washington Post today:

Statement (pdf of actual ad)

Although its collapse has dominated recent media coverage, the financial sector is not the only segment of the U.S. economy running into serious trouble. The institutions that govern the labor market have also failed, producing the unusual and unhealthy situation in which hourly compensation for American workers has stagnated even as their productivity soared.

Indeed, from 2000 to 2007, the income of the median working-age household fell by $2,000- an unprecedented decline. In that time, virtually all of the nation’s economic growth went to a small number of wealthy Americans. An important reason for the shift from broadly-shared prosperity to growing inequality is the erosion of workers’ ability to form unions and bargain collectively.

A natural response of workers unable to improve their economic situation is to form unions to negotiate a fair share of the economy, and that desire is borne out by recent surveys. Millions of American workers – more than half of non-managers – have said they want a union at their work place. Yet only 7.5% of private sector workers are now represented by a union. And in all of 2007, fewer than 60,000 workers won union status through government-sanctioned elections. What explains this disconnect?

The problem is that the election process overseen by the National Labor Relations Board has become drawn out and acrimonious, with management campaigning fiercely to deter unionization, sometimes to the extent of violating the labor law. Union sympathizers are routinely threatened or even fired, and they have little effective recourse under the law. Even when workers overcome this pressure and vote for a union, they are unable to obtain contracts one-third of the time due to management resistance.

To remedy this situation, the Congress is considering the Employee Free Choice Act. This act would accomplish three things: It would give workers the choice of using majority sign-up-- a simple, established procedure in which workers sign cards to indicate their support for a union – or staging an NLRB election; it triples damages for employers who fire union supporters or break other labor laws; and it creates a process to ensure that newly unionized employees have a fair shot at obtaining a first contract by calling for arbitration after 120 days of unsuccessful bargaining.

The Employee Free Choice Act will better reflect worker desires than the current “war over representation.” The Act will also lower the level of acrimony and distrust that often accompanies union elections in our current system.

A rising tide lifts all boats only when labor and management bargain on relatively equal terms. In recent decades, most bargaining power has resided with management. The current recession will further weaken the ability of workers to bargain individually. More than ever, workers will need to act together.

The Employee Free Choice Act is not a panacea, but it would restore some balance to our labor markets.  As economists, we believe this is a critically important step in rebuilding our economy and strengthening our democracy by enhancing the voice of working people in the workplace.

Statement Endorsers

Henry J. Aaron, Brookings Institution
Katharine Abraham
, University of Maryland
Philippe Aghion
, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Eileen Appelbaum
, Rutgers University
Kenneth Arrow
, Stanford University
Dean Baker
, Center for Economic Policy and Research
Jagdish Bhagwati
, Columbia University
Rebecca Blank
, Brookings Institution
Joseph Blasi
, Rutgers University
Alan S. Blinder
, Princeton University
William A. Darity
, Duke University
Brad DeLong
, University of California/Berkeley
John DiNardo
, University of Michigan
Henry Farber
, Princeton University
Robert H. Frank
, Cornell University
Richard Freeman
, Harvard University
James K. Galbraith
, University of Texas
Robert J. Gordon
, Northwestern University
Heidi Hartmann
, Institute for Women’s Policy Research
Lawrence Katz
, Harvard University
Robert Lawrence
, Harvard University
David Lee
, Princeton University
Frank Levy
, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lisa Lynch
, Brandeis University
Ray Marshall
, University of Texas
Lawrence Mishel
, Economic Policy Institute
Robert Pollin
, University of Massachusetts
William Rodgers
, Rutgers University
Dani Rodrik
, Harvard University
Jeffrey D. Sachs
, Columbia University
Robert M. Solow
, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
William Spriggs
, Howard University
Peter Temin
, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Mark Thoma
, University of Oregon
Lester C. Thurow
, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Laura Tyson
, University of California/Berkeley
Paula B. Voos
, Rutgers University
David Weil
, Boston University
Edward Wolff
, New York University

    Posted by on Wednesday, February 25, 2009 at 09:09 AM in Economics, Policy | Permalink  TrackBack (0)  Comments (105)

          

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b33869e20112790bce8828a4

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Employee Free Choice Act:


    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.