« Who Benefits from Health Care Reform? | Main | "Target the Cause Not the Symptom" »

Monday, March 22, 2010

"Effects of Fiscal Stimulus in Structural Models"

Phillip Lane of the Irish Economy blog notes a new IMF working paper on The Effects of Fiscal Stimulus in Structural Models. He says:

This new IMF working paper provides interesting analytical insights into the determinants of fiscal multipliers.  Also striking is the set of co-authors: it represents a joint collaborative effort across the IMF, ECB, European Commission, Federal Reserve, OECD and Bank of Canada.

Here are a few graphs from the report (I went overboard and there are 14 graphs below, most are on the continuation page to save space and reduce load time).

Interestingly, from the point of view of stimulating GDP, there is little difference between government investment and government consumption, and both work better than changes in taxes and transfers (one exception appears to be "targeted transfers")

[Note: if you cannot read the graphs, the models used are the EC's Quest, the IMF's GIMF, the ECB's NAWM, the Fed's FRB-US, the Fed's Sigma, and the BoC's GEM -- see the paper for more details. There are separate graphs for each of the seven fiscal policy instruments, the experiments are both with and without monetary accommodation, and both one year and two year stimulus packages are considered. Apologies for the space between the headers and the graphs -- it's in the originals]:

Mult01

Mult02

Mult03

Mult04
Mult05

Mult06

Mult07

The report also shows multipliers for two years of stimulus, and there are separate estimates for the European countries. Here are the two years of stimulus results for the US:

Mult08
Mult09
Mult10
Mult11
Mult12
Mult13

Mult14 

There are additional variations of the fiscal stimulus exercises in the paper.

    Posted by on Monday, March 22, 2010 at 03:33 PM in Academic Papers, Economics, Fiscal Policy | Permalink  Comments (1)

          


    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.