« 'Is Finance Too Competitive?' | Main | 'The President’s Opening Bid on a Grand Bargain' »

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

'Republicans Should Embrace Competition'

Since the topic of the day so far seems to be the benefits of competition:

Republicans Should Embrace Competition, by Sandeep Baliga, Cheap Talk: I associate the Republican Party with competition. The Party promotes free market ideals – even in education where it promotes charter schools and vouchers so that traditional public schools will have to improve if they want to successfully compete for students.
So why doesn’t the Republican Party embrace these ideals of fully? Republicans won reelection to the House in large part thanks to uncompetitive redistricting.
This makes the GOP weaker in the long run because it protects out of touch politicians from competition and from reality. Gerrymandering means that Republican Representatives can be oblivious to long-term demographic changes that are reshaping the electorate while Democratic Representatives in safe “districts” must disproportionately confront them. The lack of competition makes the Republican Party weaker and less responsive to demographic change. Only watching Fox News probably isn’t helping either.
The ramifications of this uncompetitive behavior likely ... made it harder for Romney to win. Mitt Romney embraced positions associated with the far right of the Republican Party in order to win the primary nomination. Many of his opponents who forced this shift in Romney’s positions were elected to the House from uncompetitive districts. ...

If the Republican Party wants its next generation of leaders to be able to win state and national elections, it should embrace competition and renounce gerrymandering. It should create House Congressional Districts that reflect demographic trends. ...

    Posted by on Tuesday, November 13, 2012 at 10:31 AM Permalink  Comments (19)

          


    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.