« 'Trillion-Dollar Deficits are Sustainable for Now' | Main | Links for 12-15-2012 »

Friday, December 14, 2012

'The Height of Fiscal Folly'

Laura Tyson echoes the message at the end of the post below this one (here too):

The Trade-Off Between Economic Growth and Deficit Reduction, by Laura D’Andrea Tyson, Commentary, NY Times: ...After three years of recovery, the economy is still operating far below its potential and long-term interest rates are hovering near historic lows. Under these circumstances, the case for expansionary fiscal measures, even if they increase the deficit temporarily, is compelling.
A recent study by the International Monetary Fund finds large positive multiplier effects of expansionary fiscal policy on output and employment under such circumstances. ... The rationale for expansionary fiscal policy is particularly compelling for federal investment spending in areas like education and infrastructure...
The economy does not need an outsize dose of fiscal austerity now; it does need a credible deficit-reduction plan to stabilize the debt-to-G.D.P. ratio gradually as the economy recovers. As I contended in an earlier Economix post, the plan should have an unemployment-rate target or trigger that would postpone deficit-reduction measures until the target is achieved. ...
The goal of deficit reduction is to ensure the economy’s long-term growth and stability. It would be the height of fiscal folly to kill the economy’s painful recovery from the Great Recession in pursuit of this goal.

    Posted by on Friday, December 14, 2012 at 01:53 PM in Budget Deficit, Economics, Fiscal Policy, Unemployment | Permalink  Comments (72)

          


    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.