« North Korean Counterfeiting | Main | More on Paid Punditry »

Monday, December 26, 2005

Paul Krugman: Health Care Costs

Paul Krugman continues his series on health care. In this column, he looks at why health care costs are increasing so rapidly and how the rapid increase can be reduced through changes in policy:

Medicine: Who Decides?, by Paul Krugman, Commentary, NY Times: Health care seems to be heading back to the top of the political agenda, and not a moment too soon. Employer-based health insurance is unraveling ... and vast Medicare costs loom on the horizon. Something must be done. But to get health reform right, we'll have to overcome wrongheaded ideas as well as powerful special interests. For decades we've been lectured on the evils of big government and the glories of the private sector. Yet health reform is a job for the public sector, which already pays most of the bills directly or indirectly and sooner or later will have to make key decisions about medical treatment. ...

Consider what happens when a new drug or other therapy becomes available. Let's assume that the new therapy is more effective ... than existing therapies ... but that the advantage isn't overwhelming. On the other hand, it's a lot more expensive than current treatments. Who decides whether patients receive the new therapy? We've traditionally relied on doctors to make such decisions. But the rise of medical technology ... makes ... medicine ... in which doctors call for every procedure that might be of medical benefit, increasingly expensive.

Moreover, the high-technology nature of modern medical spending has given rise to a powerful medical-industrial complex that seeks to influence doctors' decisions. ...[D]rug companies in particular spend more marketing their products to doctors than they do developing those products ... They wouldn't do that if doctors were immune to persuasion.

So if costs are to be controlled, someone has to act as a referee on doctors' medical decisions. During the 1990's it seemed, briefly, as if private H.M.O.'s could play that role. But then there was a public backlash. It turns out that even in America, with its faith in the free market, people don't trust for-profit corporations to make decisions about their health.

Despite the failure ... to control costs with H.M.O.'s, conservatives continue to believe that the magic of the private sector will provide the answer. ... Their latest big idea is health savings accounts, which ... induce "cost sharing" - that is, individuals will ... pay a larger share of their medical costs out of pocket and make their own decisions about care. ...[I]s giving individuals responsibility for their own health spending really the answer to rising costs? No.

For one thing, insurance will always cover the really big expenses. We're not going to have a system in which people pay for heart surgery out of their health savings accounts and save money by choosing cheaper procedures. And that's not an unfair example. The Brookings study puts it this way: "Most health costs are incurred by a small proportion of the population whose expenses greatly exceed plausible limits on out-of-pocket spending."

Moreover, it's neither fair nor realistic to expect ordinary citizens to have enough medical expertise to make life-or-death decisions about their own treatment. A well-known experiment ... carried out by the RAND Corporation... found that when individuals pay a higher share of medical costs out of pocket, they cut back on necessary as well as unnecessary health spending.

So cost-sharing, like H.M.O.'s, is a detour from real health care reform. Eventually, we'll have to accept the fact that there's no magic in the private sector, and that health care - including the decision about what treatment is provided - is a public responsibility.

Previous column (12/23): Paul Krugman:  The Tax-Cut Zombies.
Next (12/29) column: Paul Krugman: Heck of a Job Bushie

    Posted by on Monday, December 26, 2005 at 12:15 AM in Economics, Health Care | Permalink  TrackBack (8)  Comments (22)

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b33869e200d8345b33e669e2

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Paul Krugman: Health Care Costs:

    » Paul Krugman: Medicine: Who Decides. from Tim Worstall

    Paul Krugman’s latest effort on health care is, how shall I put this politely, insane? No, I’m not the world’s biggest fan of the way in which the US health care market currently works but people really do want to [Read More]

    Tracked on Monday, December 26, 2005 at 03:43 AM

    » Paul Krugman: Medicine: Who Decides. from Tim Worstall

    Paul Krugman’s latest effort on health care is, how shall I put this politely, insane? No, I’m not the world’s biggest fan of the way in which the US health care market currently works but people really do want to [Read More]

    Tracked on Monday, December 26, 2005 at 05:04 AM

    » Ok, this is a little over from btw.net Weblog

    [Read More]

    Tracked on Tuesday, December 27, 2005 at 08:40 AM

    » Who pays for health care? from Asymmetrical Information

    Paul Krugman has a good column on rising healthcare costs and how to ration them. Krugman has been a frothing nutter for about 6 years now, so it's nice to see something honest and reasonable for a change. On the topic of rising healthcare costs, Krugm... [Read More]

    Tracked on Wednesday, December 28, 2005 at 02:17 PM

    » Who pays for health care? from Asymmetrical Information

    Paul Krugman has a good column on rising healthcare costs and how to ration them. Krugman has been a frothing nutter for about 6 years now, so it's nice to see something honest and reasonable for a change. On the topic of rising healthcare costs, Krugm... [Read More]

    Tracked on Wednesday, December 28, 2005 at 05:59 PM

    » Who pays for health care? from Asymmetrical Information

    Paul Krugman has a good column on rising healthcare costs and how to ration them. Krugman has been a frothing nutter for about 6 years now, so it's nice to see something honest and reasonable for a change. On the topic of rising healthcare costs, Krugm... [Read More]

    Tracked on Thursday, January 05, 2006 at 04:51 AM

    » Who pays for health care? from Asymmetrical Information

    Paul Krugman has a good column on rising healthcare costs and how to ration them. Krugman has been a frothing nutter for about 6 years now, so it's nice to see something honest and reasonable for a change. On the topic of rising healthcare costs, Krugm... [Read More]

    Tracked on Friday, February 10, 2006 at 12:48 PM

    » Who pays for health care? from Asymmetrical Information

    Paul Krugman has a good column on rising healthcare costs and how to ration them. Krugman has been a frothing nutter for about 6 years now, so it's nice to see something honest and reasonable for a change. On the topic of rising healthcare costs, Krugm... [Read More]

    Tracked on Friday, February 10, 2006 at 12:52 PM


    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.