« Stiglitz: Nationalization of Bolivia's Energy Resources Driven by Commendable Democratic Progress | Main | Wheaties Instead of Waffles »

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Ask Robert

Lately I've had posts leading with "Robert Reich has advice for Democrats...," and "Robert Reich ... gives the Fed some advice." This time, the advice is for Republicans:

Minimum Politics, by Robert B. Reich, American Prospect: Between now and the mid-term elections in November, Senate Democrats will be looking for every opportunity to add a minimum wage amendment to anything that moves in the Senate. The reason is simple: In poll after poll, more than 80 percent of Americans say they favor an increase. Every time Republicans vote it down they look like grinches.

Most Americans understand it’s a matter of simple fairness. The current minimum is $5.15 an hour, which comes to $10,712 a year for a full-time worker. These days, a garden-variety chief executive takes home $8 million a year, which comes to $3,846 an hour. The Bush tax breaks have given them an extra $60 an hour.

Granted, many workers at or near the minimum wage are not the only people in their households who are working. Some are teenagers. But the majority are adults, and some are heads of households. And they deserve a decent wage, especially now that we've ended welfare and have a large and growing number of people who are working full-time but are still in poverty.

Now, we can't raise the minimum wage too much -- probably not more than two dollars an hour -- without causing some employers to decide it’s not worth hiring that extra person. From a purely economic perspective, a better way to make sure poor workers get a decent wage is by expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit, a reverse income tax that supplements the wages of workers on the bottom. ...

But the minimum wage is also a moral statement about the minimum value of work in our society. And it’s been dropping. In the late 1940s and 1950s, the minimum wage stayed about half the wage of the average non-supervisory worker. Now, it’s down to 31 percent, its lowest portion since World War II. After adjusting for inflation, today’s minimum of $5.15 is at its lowest level since 1955...

The basic question is what a decent society can afford to pay its lowest-paid workers. Between 2002 and 2005, American productivity grew 10 percent yet workers in the bottom tenth of the income range still lost ground, with average wages dropping 3 percent in real terms.

Some of this drop can be attributed to a flood of low-skilled, undocumented immigrants willing to work for peanuts. Unlawful immigration may be a boon to employers and consumers, but it has taken a toll on low-wage workers who now have to compete with them. The eagerness of undocumented workers to accept below-minimum wages is a big reason why unscrupulous employers are willing to run the risk of hiring them.

So here’s the deal. Raise the minimum to $7 an hour, and also increase dramatically penalties on employers who fail to pay it.

If Republicans were smart, they’d add another provision: Index the minimum wage to inflation, so they’d no longer have to look like grinches by voting down minimum wage bills every election season.

I think there's room for debate about the consequences of illegal immigration for low income workers. In addition, globalization and abundant cheap labor in other parts of the world play a role here too, including changing the incentives for manufacturers to locate in Mexico and provide jobs for those who otherwise seek illegal employment in the U.S. That is, increasing illegal immigration and falling real wages may both be driven by, at least in part, the pressures of globalization. But I don't want to take this too far since this is not essential to Reich's main point and it distracts from his call to raise and index the minimum wage.

    Posted by on Wednesday, July 5, 2006 at 01:19 PM in Economics, Income Distribution, Policy, Politics, Unemployment | Permalink  TrackBack (0)  Comments (15)


    TrackBack URL for this entry:

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ask Robert:


    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.