« The Rise of Populism | Main | The Puzzled Club »

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

David Altig Deflates Ball

Updating this post from a few days ago, David Altig reacted like I did to Philip Ball's column in the Financial Times:

Fisking Philip Ball, by David Altig, macroblog: A few days ago Mark Thoma posted an article by Philip Ball, "consultant editor of Nature", taking economists to task for, well, being economists.  Although Mark handled the rebuttal quite nicely, and there was lots and lots of fine commentary on Mark's site (a good chunk of which is summarized by Dave Iverson), I found the article so wrong-headed that I just can't help myself from commenting.  So, a-commenting I go... [continue reading...]

David has a long, thorough, rebuttal illustrating Ball's "wrong-headed" assertions. Here's a taste of David's reaction:

Don't like calling it a cycle?  Fine. Call it Aggregate Fluctuations.  Call it Co-Movement In Business Statistics.  Call it a Kumquat.  Just don't pretend a picky semantic point is serious criticism. ...

    Posted by on Wednesday, November 1, 2006 at 01:27 PM in Economics, Methodology, Science | Permalink  TrackBack (2)  Comments (27)


    TrackBack URL for this entry:

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference David Altig Deflates Ball:

    » Dave Altig on Phillip Ball's Rant on Neoclassical from Ecological Economics

    Dave Atlig (macroblog) has a good rejoinder to Phillip Ball's Criticism of Neoclassical Economic Theory. Here is a snip: …It is true that neoclassical economists tend to be the methodological children of Milton Friedman, heirs to a positivist ... [Read More]

    Tracked on Wednesday, November 01, 2006 at 05:39 PM

    » In Defence of Economics? from Alpha.Sources

    I guess I am what you would call a young economist in spe. In fact I am not much of an economist if you at my academic degrees but that will change after my i have finished my Master's studies. But what are economics (yes I know the dismal science bu... [Read More]

    Tracked on Wednesday, November 01, 2006 at 06:24 PM


    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.