« Does the U.S. Have a Distorted Self-Image? | Main | Are CEOs Underpaid? »

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Krugman versus Cavuto

From ThinkProgress, Krugman versus Cavuto on Fox News:

Cavuto to Krugman: ‘You Are Lying To People’, ThinkProgress: Princeton economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman went on Fox News this afternoon to talk about his new article in Rolling Stone Magazine, “How the Super-Rich Are Screwing America.”

Krugman’s article is about how income inequality is getting worse and, as a result, even though some aggregate economic indicators are positive, most people aren’t benefiting. Cavuto told Krugman, “Here’s what I’m saying that you’re doing: You are lying to people.” Cavuto claims that income inequality isn’t “dramatically worse now than 10 years ago, 20 years ago.” Watch it...

Actually, Krugman is completely right: things are dramatically worse now than 10 or 20 years ago. Here’s a chart from the Economic Policy Institute that tracks the ratio of the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans to median income in the United States, a standard measure of income inequality ...

Full transcript:

CAVUTO: Here’s what I’m saying that you’re doing: You are lying to people. That’s what I think that you’re doing.

KRUGMAN: I haven’t heard a lie yet. But, look, if that’s the way you want to do it, I mean, fair and balanced, go all the way. Look, c’mon, the fact of the matter is–

CAVUTO: No, no, you don’t have to be snide. You have to be factual.

KRUGMAN: You’re being snide.

CAVUTO: No, no, you’re mentioning good data. You’re saying there’s a growing divide between the haves and have nots. Others have argued that very effectively and very eloquently, just like you. All I’m saying is that the math that applied now, can’t you apply it in other periods, when there have been Democratic presidents who’ve had the same dislocations? You’re saying that it’s somehow dramatically worse now than it was 10 years ago, 20 years ago?

KRUGMAN: Yeah, actually, it is dramatically worse now than it was 10 years, 20 years ago. All of the measures of inequality have just gone off the charts. It didn’t start with Bush — and I actually say that if anybody, you know, buys Rolling Stone, reads the article — it actually starts even before Reagan, so this is not just Bush. The point of the matter is that, when, in these last five years, as it’s becomes clear that this is a really growing problem, that most people are not sharing in the economy’s growth, the policies of Bush have been at every point to push that inequality further.

Update: PGL at Angry Bear has more.

Update: Video of entire interview (from comments).

    Posted by on Tuesday, December 5, 2006 at 05:58 PM in Economics, Income Distribution, Press | Permalink  TrackBack (1)  Comments (22)


    TrackBack URL for this entry:

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Krugman versus Cavuto:

    » Income Inequality: Some Evidence for Neil Cavuto to Scream At from Angry Bear

    Tim Worstall argues: Now I assume that the argument over inequality is really about how much people have, yes? So it's consumption inequality, if anything, that we should be worrying about ... So, in attacking a Fox News guy Judd makes a schoolb... [Read More]

    Tracked on Wednesday, December 06, 2006 at 04:42 PM


    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.