« "Eight Hundred Years of Financial Folly" | Main | Mankiw: The Wealth Trajectory: Rewards for the Few »

Saturday, April 19, 2008

About Those TV Generals...

This is about the "effort to dupe the American public with propaganda dressed as independent military analysis."

It's unlikely this was the only effort along these lines, there are all sorts of places that could have been, and probably were, targeted using similar means, blogs being one example. As more of this comes out, as it will (though by its nature there will be parts we will never know), people will lose more faith in government, news agencies, and others who played into this effort - and given how they've acted, that loss of faith is understandable. The costs of war are much broader than the trillions of dollars we can measure directly, especially when it's a war that has to be sold using the means described in this article. The damage this administration has done is large, and not just on this front, and it puzzles me why so many who say they hold patriotism and the constitution in such high regard put up with, and even encourage, this sort of thing:

Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand, by David Barstow, Message machine, NY Times: In the summer of 2005, the Bush administration confronted a fresh wave of criticism over Guantánamo Bay. The detention center had just been branded “the gulag of our times” by Amnesty International, there were new allegations of abuse from United Nations human rights experts and calls were mounting for its closure.

The administration’s communications experts responded swiftly. Early one Friday morning, they put a group of retired military officers on one of the jets normally used by Vice President Dick Cheney and flew them to Cuba for a carefully orchestrated tour of Guantánamo.

To the public, these men are members of a familiar fraternity, presented tens of thousands of times on television and radio as “military analysts” whose long service has equipped them to give authoritative and unfettered judgments about the most pressing issues of the post-Sept. 11 world.

Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.

The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air.

Those business relationships are hardly ever disclosed to the viewers, and sometimes not even to the networks themselves. But collectively, the men on the plane and several dozen other military analysts represent more than 150 military contractors either as lobbyists, senior executives, board members or consultants. The companies include defense heavyweights, but also scores of smaller companies, all part of a vast assemblage of contractors scrambling for hundreds of billions in military business generated by the administration’s war on terror. It is a furious competition, one in which inside information and easy access to senior officials are highly prized.

Records and interviews show how the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform the analysts into a kind of media Trojan horse — an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks.

Analysts have been wooed in hundreds of private briefings with senior military leaders, including officials with significant influence over contracting and budget matters, records show. They have been taken on tours of Iraq and given access to classified intelligence. They have been briefed by officials from the White House, State Department and Justice Department, including Mr. Cheney, Alberto R. Gonzales and Stephen J. Hadley.

In turn, members of this group have echoed administration talking points, sometimes even when they suspected the information was false or inflated. Some analysts acknowledge they suppressed doubts because they feared jeopardizing their access.

A few expressed regret for participating in what they regarded as an effort to dupe the American public with propaganda dressed as independent military analysis. ... [...continue reading...]

    Posted by on Saturday, April 19, 2008 at 02:34 PM in Iraq and Afghanistan, Press | Permalink  TrackBack (0)  Comments (20)


    TrackBack URL for this entry:

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference About Those TV Generals...:


    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.