« links for 2008-04-28 | Main | "America Needs to Make a New Case for Trade" »

Monday, April 28, 2008

"The Cost of Rising Inequality"

If the gains from economic growth since 19779 had been shared equally instead of flowing disproportionately toward the top of the income distribution, how would more income would the bottom 80% of the distribution have had?:

The Cost of Rising Inequality, by Lane Kenworthy: Income inequality in the U.S. has increased sharply in the past generation. Those who worry about this development do so partly on grounds of fairness and partly because inequality may have adverse effects on politics, health, and crime. Sometimes overlooked is a more immediate cost: slow income growth for a large chunk of the population.

The following chart shows average inflation-adjusted incomes in 1979 and 2005 for various groups of households: the bottom 20%, the lower-middle 20%, the middle 20%, the upper-middle 20%, the next 10%, the next 9%, and the top 1%. The incomes include government transfers and subtract taxes. The data, from the Congressional Budget Office (here), are the best available for this purpose.

The average income among all households rose at a rate of 1.5% per year over these two and a half decades. But as the chart makes plain, much of that increase went to households at the top of the distribution, especially those at the very top. Households in the bottom three quintiles experienced very slow income growth — 0.2% per year for the poorest quintile, 0.6% for the next, and 0.7% for the middle.

What would 2005 incomes have looked like if income growth had been proportionate rather than heavily skewed in favor of the top — in other words, if all incomes had increased at a pace of 1.5% per year? The dashed line in the next chart shows the answer. To make it easier to see the effect, I include only the bottom 80% of households here. All of them would have been a good bit better off.

It’s often said that progressives focus too much on the distribution of income and don’t pay enough attention to absolute income levels. In fact, its impact on absolute incomes is one of the chief reasons to be concerned about rising inequality.

    Posted by on Monday, April 28, 2008 at 12:21 AM in Economics, Income Distribution | Permalink  TrackBack (0)  Comments (66)


    TrackBack URL for this entry:

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "The Cost of Rising Inequality":


    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.