"The Blame for High Gas prices"
Richard Serlin:
The blame for high gas prices rests on simple-minded Republican ideology not speculators, by Richard Serlin: In Paul Krugman's June 27th column he writes:
Why are politicians so eager to pin the blame for oil prices on speculators? Because it lets them believe that we don’t have to adapt to a world of expensive gas.
A perhaps even bigger reason why Republicans want to blame speculators for sky high gas costs is that they don't want the public to put the blame where it's really due – on them.
For decades Republicans have constantly blocked Democratic attempts to increase fuel mileage and many other efficiency and conservation measures. They've also constantly blocked or cut spending on alternative energy, all the while mindlessly chanting "Free market". The economics community had proven long ago that there are many situations and ways where a government role can add greatly to efficiency, wealth, and welfare, but this is a party that long ago refused to think beyond slogans. They acted as though not being simple-minded was a vice, liberal and un-American, when in fact, thinking, and believing in science, evidence, and logic is one of the things that made this country great, and the richest and strongest in the world.
Now we're paying a big price for Republican ideology in energy and so many other things. Had the Democrats not been outvoted, filibustered, and vetoed from enacting their "big government" mileage, conservation, research, and other energy measures over the last almost three decades, gasoline might be less than half its price today...
And, of course, it wouldn't hurt that this would have starved the terrorists, and some of the worst authoritarian regimes in the world, of money, and greatly decreased the momentous risks of global warming,... benefits that aren't taken into account by the magical free markets. ...
Posted by Mark Thoma on Saturday, June 28, 2008 at 03:33 AM in Economics, Market Failure, Politics, Regulation |
Permalink
TrackBack (0)
Comments (45)
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.