Adam Smith On State Expenditures and Interventions, by Gavin Kennedy: A correspondent asks:
I'm still puzzled as to where Smith draws the line with regard to government intervention. In Book V, Chapter I, he talks about justice, defence and public works but it seems that he has a wider application for the state in market matters. I'd be very interested to hear your viewpoint on this.
To which I replied:
Yes, it is widely believed, even by some top academic economists, especially on Blogland, that Adam Smith favoured small government, often represented by the phrase, the 'night watchman state', which in fact was coined in the late 19th century by a firebrand socialist.
I have posted this list from my book, Adam Smith: a moral philosopher and his political economy' (2008, pp 247-48, Palgrave Macmillan):
- "The Navigation Acts, blessed by Smith under the assertion that ‘defence, however, is of much more importance than opulence’; (WN464)
- Sterling marks on plate and stamps upon linen and woollen cloth (WN138-9)
- Enforcement of contracts by a system of justice; (WN720)
- Wages to be paid in money, not goods;
- Regulations of paper money in banking; (WN437)
- Obligations to build party wars to prevent the spread of fire; (WN324)
- Rights of farmers to send farm produce to the best market (except ‘only in the most urgent necessity’);(WN 539)
- Premiums and other encouragements to advance the linen and woollen industries’; (TMS185)
- ‘Police’, or preservation of the ‘cleanliness of roads, streets, and to prevent the bad effects of corruption and putrifying substances’;
- ensuring the ‘cheapness or plenty [of provisions]’; (LJ6; 331)
- patrols by town guards, fire fighters and of other hazardous accidents; (LJ331-2)
- Erecting and maintaining certain public works and public institutions intended to facilitate commerce (roads, bridges, canals and harbours); (WN723)
- Coinage and the Mint; (WN478; 1724)
- Post office; (WN724)
- Regulation of institutions, such as company structures (joint stock companies; co-partneries, regulated companies); (WN731-58)
- Temporary monopolies, including copyright, patents, of fixed duration; (WN754)
- Education of youth (‘village schools’, curriculum design); (WN758-89)
- Education of people of all ages (tythes or land tax) (WN788);
- Encouragement of ‘the frequency and gaiety of publick diversions’; (WN796)
- The prevention of ‘leprosy or any other loathsome and offensive disease’ from spreading among the population; (WN787-88)
- Encouragement of martial exercises; (WN786)
- Registration of mortgages for land, houses, and boats over two tons; (WN861, 863)
- Government restrictions on interest for borrowing (usury laws) to overcome investor ‘stupidity’; (WN356-7)
- Laws against banks issuing low-denomination promissory notes; (WN324)
- Natural liberty may be breached if individuals ‘endanger the security of the whole society’; (WN324)
- Limiting ‘free exportation of corn’ only ‘in cases of the most urgent necessity’ (‘dearth’ turning into ‘famine’); (WN539)
- Moderate export taxes on wool exports for government revenue; (WN 879)
Jacob Viner concluded, unsurprisingly, that Adam Smith was not a doctrinaire laissez-faire advocate.
[From Viner, J. 1928. ‘Adam Smith and Laissez-faire’, In ‘Adam Smith, 1776-1928: Lectures to Commemorate the Sesquicentennial of the Publication of Wealth Of Nations, p 53, August M. Kelly, Fairfield, NJ; I provided the references to Wealth Of Nations.]
...The pure theory of markets, such as neoclassical economics and general equilibrium as much that it is meritorious, but it is a theory not a description of how markets actually work.
The players in markets are real human beings, not variables that operate within narrow confines of deterministic mathematics. ... The message is clear: start with the history, how things arrived at their present day circumstances and arrangements, and observe how they operate, drawing on lessons of how they worked, more or less, well in the past and what that teaches us selectively about what works and what doesn’t, assemble general principles that seem to be of practical benefit to assumed goals, and apply them to current events and trends.
Of course, everything depends on the selection and the objectives. ...Smith’s objective function was how an economy, the State, and the people, could spread opulence from commerce to the nation, especially the poor majority, drawing on how nations remained stable (justice and the distinction of ranks), became prosperous (the desire of people to ‘better themselves’) given as much freedom to do so (Liberty) without it degenerating into monopoly, restrictive protectionism, and opulence for a minority using their political influence over the State, while leaving the poor as they had been left throughout all history as serfs, slaves, and penurious labourers.
Smith believed that a commercial society was the best opportunity for continual growth and the spread of opulence, and showed in his critique of mercantile political economy, as it had operated since the 15th century and was operating up to the Fall of Rome in the 5th century, what changes might be made by the legislature to let commerce do its work as speedily as was practicable in the real world and not in some kind of impossible utopia.
He was not an ideologue. His understanding of history demonstrated what was possible among real men as they were, not ideal ‘guardians’ of public interest who usually made everything worse than it need be.
Hence, his proposals for ‘public works and public institutions’, which were written in is inimitable style, were apparently quite modest (the incorrect ‘take’ on them by laissez-faire ideologues), though they added to a level of state expenditure that was actually quiet ambitious, with separately argued cases for the items listed by Jacob Viner in 1928 above, which together extended the agenda of appropriate expenditure by a classical liberal state (and even one ran by quite illiberal personnel).