« KDS is Alive and Well | Main | Learn to Stop Worrying and Love (Moderate) Inflation »

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

'This, by Definition, is Job Polarization'

Via Josh Lehner at Oregon Economic Analysis:

... I do want to point out that the fundamental changes occurring in the labor market are best seen at the occupational level not the industry level. When discussing cognitive or routine or manual type functions and how technological change is impacting them, these generally cut across industries by occupation. When I look at employment growth from 2010 to 2012, using occupational groups, I get the following (trying to match the great graphics that both the WSJ and Atlanta Fed use)..


What we see here is strong job growth at both the top and bottom ends of the wage spectrum. Yes, food preparation and personal care account for a disproportionately large share of jobs gained in recent years, but so too have business and financial services, healthcare practitioners, computer and mathematical occupations and management. Where we have seen slower growth is in the middle. The light blue bars, which I term lower middle-wage jobs account for about 40% of all occupations in 2012 yet account for just 26% of the growth. The dark blue bars, which I term upper middle-wage jobs, account for another 19% of all occupations and 0% of the growth. This, by definition, is job polarization. ...

    Posted by on Tuesday, August 20, 2013 at 02:07 AM in Economics, Income Distribution | Permalink  Comments (19)


    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.