'Why ask Why? Forward Causal Inference and Reverse Causal Questions'
Andrew Gelman and Guido Imbens posted this at the NBER to try to get the attention of economists:
Why ask Why? Forward Causal Inference and Reverse Causal Questions, by Andrew Gelman and Guido Imbens, NBER Working Paper No. 19614, November 2013 NBER: The statistical and econometrics literature on causality is more focused on "effects of causes" than on "causes of effects." That is, in the standard approach it is natural to study the effect of a treatment, but it is not in general possible to define the causes of any particular outcome. This has led some researchers to dismiss the search for causes as "cocktail party chatter" that is outside the realm of science. We argue here that the search for causes can be understood within traditional statistical frameworks as a part of model checking and hypothesis generation. We argue that it can make sense to ask questions about the causes of effects, but the answers to these questions will be in terms of effects of causes.
Posted by Mark Thoma on Monday, November 11, 2013 at 07:35 AM in Academic Papers, Economics |
Permalink
Comments (2)