« 'Why Currency Manipulation Matters' | Main | 'Disaster Risk and Asset Pricing' »

Thursday, June 11, 2015

'The Mutability of Wages'

Paul Krugman:

Arindrajit Dube enlarges on my post about efficiency wages, pointing out that the same logic applies to firms that have monopsony power. That’s a very good point — and I think we’re circling in on an important part of the logic behind the “new view” on inequality policy, which says that policies to enhance worker bargaining power can have major effects on the distribution of market income. ...
What Dube, I, and many others are suggesting is ... that for quite a few employers — including large service-sector companies — the situation looks ... like this:

There isn’t a sharply defined “going wage”, either because the firm has monopsony power — it can, in effect, choose the going wage in its local labor market — or because efficiency wage considerations lead it to pay more than the minimum, so that there are normally more applicants than places. And as I’ve drawn it, the top of the hill relating the wage rate to profits is fairly flat. In particular, the firm shouldn’t mind very much paying a somewhat higher wage, because this will produce offsetting benefits — a larger supply of labor if it has monoposony power, lower turnover or higher productivity if efficiency wages are an issue, maybe all of the above.
The point is that under these circumstances it needn’t be all that hard to push up wages: the threat of union organizing or a consumer boycott, even moral suasion from the government might be enough. So the standard view that it’s very hard to change the distribution of market income, that policy must involve after-market taxes and transfers, may be quite wrong.

    Posted by on Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 10:53 AM Permalink  Comments (27)


    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.