There are Two Productivity Puzzles
Patrick Schneider at Bank Underground (at the B of E):
There are two productivity puzzles: Much has been written about the productivity puzzle. But there are actually two puzzles apparent in the data – one in the level that hit at the crisis and the other in the growth rate, which is a more recent phenomenon – and they could be driven by completely different sources. Distinguishing between the two puzzles is important precisely because of these potential differences – if anyone analyses the puzzle as a whole looking for the force driving it, the actual underlying variety will confound our estimates of the relative importance of these drivers.
In this post I discuss:
- what people mean by the productivity puzzle, usually a percent deviation from the pre-crisis trend;
- how I think of it as actually two puzzles: one in the level and the other in the growth rate;
- and why this distinction can be important, using the example of a simple growth accounting decomposition of productivity growth into capital deepening and technological advancement.
Posted by Mark Thoma on Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 10:11 AM in Economics, Productivity |
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.